40 Burst results for "Senate"

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Democracy Now

Democracy Now

01:02 min | 9 min ago

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Democracy Now

"Goodman. President Trump announced Saturday the nomination of federal appeals Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat on the Supreme Court. 48 year old Barrett is a devout Catholic who's taken conservative stances on abortion, gun rights, Immigration and LGBTQ rights. Ah, former Notre Dame law professor she clerked for the late Supreme Court. Justice Antonin Scalia, the Republican controlled Senate could confirm any Cockney barrack just days before election Day as hearings are set to begin October, 12 Over the weekend, demonstrations were held across the country, calling on democratic lawmakers to do everything in their power to delay proceedings until after the results of the election are known. Meanwhile, House Democrats will introduce a bill Tuesday, setting an 18 year term limit for Supreme Court justices. We'll have more on Judge Barrett and the Supreme Court later in the broadcast. In your times published an explosive report diving into over two decades of Trump's tax returns, which reveal he paid no income taxes at all and 10 of the last 15 years. The report also finds he paid just $750 in federal income tax and 2016 the year he was elected. According to the Times, Trump minimized his taxes by reporting mass losses across his businesses, including his golf courses in his hotel in Washington, D. C. The Trump family also reduced its tax bill by paying so called consulting thieves to Ivanka Trump as an employee of the Trump Organization. The Times also reveals Trump's been locked in a battle with the IRS over a $73 million tax refund he claimed after his casino business in Atlantic City collapsed. Trump could be forced to pay over $100 million if he loses. In addition, Trump has over $300 million and loans he personally guaranteed that will soon come due. Trump dismissed. The New York Times report is fake news. We'll have more on the story after headlines in Louisville, Kentucky, over two dozen protesters were arrested Saturday as demonstrations continue over the grand jury decision last week, clearing police officers of shooting and killing Briana Taylor, the 26 year old African American TNT in her own home in March. On Friday. Taylor's family spoke publicly for the first time since the grand jury's decision beyond the Austin Taylors aunt read a statement written by Tyler's mother to make a polymer. When I speak on it. I'm considered an angry black woman. But.

President Trump Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court Trump Organization Supreme Court. Justice Antonin Scalia Ruth Bader Ginsburg The Times Professor Briana Taylor Senate Goodman. Louisville IRS Kentucky The New York Times Atlantic City
Harris to voters: Don't give up as Trump rushes court pick

AP News Radio

00:56 sec | 7 hrs ago

Harris to voters: Don't give up as Trump rushes court pick

"Democratic vice presidential nominee comelec Harris is urging voters not to be discouraged by GOP efforts to fill a Supreme Court seat before the election Harris says she knows everybody's tired that's how Republican leaders want they want you to feel like you're fight doesn't matter but in swing state North Carolina Harris says Democrats will not give up or give in we will not let the infection that president trump has injected into the presidency and into Congress that has paralyzed our politics and pitted Americans against each other bread to the United States Supreme Court keris sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee which means she'll play a direct role in the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation flights starting in two weeks the Senate's never confirmed a High Court nominees so close to an election Sager make ani Washington

Comelec Harris Donald Trump Congress United States Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Sager Ani Washington GOP President Trump Amy Coney Barrett High Court
Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory

Coast to Coast AM with George Noory

01:27 min | 48 min ago

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory

"Fights. Besides $750 her that does resolute and it's also you know, four years ago, we talked about being able to avoid paying taxes legally avoid, you know, dealing with the tax laws being so brilliant that figure out howto pay, you know a lower tax rate, but this is not just avoiding what, But what is being seen in this reporting is avoiding, evading, perhaps robbing and cheating. We'll see again. It's one thing an Amazon Zero in taxes. That's the real problem. We have to reform our tax. Sure it's broken. And yet every time we try to reform the tax code, the lives go. No, no, no, no, no, we don't. We don't want to make it all easy. And one page and Very straightforward because the rich lives want to keep all their deductions and there, but they want to pretend like they think that paying taxes is patriotic, but they don't want to pay that. They want you to pay taxes. That's the whole game. That's that's the entire con As you see it here, perhaps robbing and cheating, Mika Brzezinski says no, that would then mean that he's given To the I R s the means to actually go after him Criminally, Which is not what's happening here. Anyone who looks at this Than any expert worthy of of the of the term who sees what's in this? Remember, this is not even it's only they published the tax returns. This is The New York Times and The president says that they're all full of crap. I mean, he might be a little bit It might be a little excessive and saying they're totally full of crap. I don't know. I'm so I'm assuming they probably have someone who leaked the tax returns to him. Okay? I don't think they're completely making this up wholesale. But he's saying it's it's garbage. We can't know how much of it is garbage, but there's nothing in here. That's a problem. It's also boring. It's also who cares. What? What do they want? In what world? Let's take this Take a different approach to this. What would have to be in those tax returns for them to not attack Donald Trump his tax runs well, let's take an example. Mitt Romney, the Democrats. As you know, Harry Reid famously said on the floor of the Senate so he could not be in any way legally liable for this, he said Mitt Romney hadn't paid taxes in 10 years. That was a lie. And Romney paid a lot of taxes and say what you will about the guy and I've said a lot. He is rich, and he did make a lot of money. But Mitt Romney was paying taxes that was accompanied and later on. When Harry Reid was asked about this. His response was well, he didn't win, Did he? It's just a slime smear, that's all wass. Character assassination. That was Mitt Romney, who I think is a very by the book by the letter kind of guy. I mean, he's sort of a grownup hall monitor type. And and he even Found himself attacked on taxes. You know John Kerry. In 2004 paid something like 11%, or some just pitiful tax rate on unearned income on effectively passive income of the assets that his wife owns his wife. Married a very wealthy man. And then John Kerry married her. So you know, he paid very, very low taxes a little. So when he's you know, taking the Million dollar yacht to the multi million dollar house and the vineyards, leaving the multi million dollar mansion on Beacon Hill in Boston. I mean, not paying a lot of taxes. I think John Kerry also even moved his boat Anchorage so that he could pay less taxes, and one thing you'll find is that even very wealthy people. People that have no no realistic concern about ever running out of money or not being able to live a very fancy lifestyle, even very wealthy people. Can be very cheap. I've seen this a lot. In fact, some of the richest people that I know are fixated on money, but Maybe that's a conversation for another time. I just think that this this story on the trump taxes, it's boring and nobody cares and they can try to pretend that everybody cares, but ultimately it's boring and nobody really cares. Except for the journos who have been chomping at the bit. For years on this thing, and all along I've been saying, guys, the I R s already has it. You know, you listen to show No, I know I was never never worried. About Trump's tax is and what it would mean for him because I'm like the IRS. Already has it. They already have the taxes. So what are we even talking about here? What He's going to have 100 note from pulled the door is very good with Trump is giving me all the things I need for. Ah, Stealing election. The $1 million Trump ruled the chick. No, I don't think that's what's gonna happen. I don't think the president had some notes. Neither dear Trump is lad. I love your big Smoochy Smoochy here a billion dollars. I don't think that that's a thing. Maybe we should make it a thing kind of a fun sketch. But but But, Trumpy I miss you come back for snuggles with Vlad, right like that wasn't going to exist. That wasn't going to be a thing that actually happened, but they believed For some reason, they convinced themselves that it that it was going to happen..

Donald Trump Mitt Romney John Kerry Harry Reid President Trump Mika Brzezinski Smoochy Smoochy Democrats The New York Times Vlad Boston Senate Beacon Hill IRS
Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to US supreme court

Morning Edition

00:52 sec | 14 hrs ago

Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to US supreme court

"President. Trump says he believes the Senate will move quickly to confirm Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to the U. S. Supreme Court. Over the weekend. The president formally nominated bearer to succeed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as NPR's Claudia Chrysalis reports. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham says confirmation hearings will begin October 12 Following that we'll have two days of questioning and then we'll report out this nomination out of committee about 10. Days later on October 22nd. Graham said Barrett would get a quote full fair hearing in that time and then to be up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to schedule a vote on the floor of the full Senate. The Supreme Court vacancy is expected to come up tomorrow night when Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden face off in their first presidential debate in Ohio.

Senate Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Senate Judiciary Committee U. S. Supreme Court Donald Trump Lindsey Graham Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Mitch Mcconnell Claudia Chrysalis President Trump Joe Biden NPR Chairman Ohio President.
Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Sean Hannity

Sean Hannity

00:33 min | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Sean Hannity

"Bipartisan measure keeping government funded for the next 10 weeks and preventing a government shutdown late Wednesday night should clear the Senate early this week. A short term plan, known as a continuing resolution one broad house approval last week. It does not include any money for the Corona virus pandemic, but renews a farm stabilization program and boost funding for federal nutrition programs. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin renewed talks like last week on covert legislation. The House could still consider a Democratic back bill this week, proposing more than $2. Trillion in stimulus and relief spending. Jared Halpern, a Fox News new numbers is showing the military suicides have jumped by as much as 20% this year compared to the same period in 2019, along with more violent behavior being reported as well. Numbers vary by individual service. The Army's 30% spike pushes the total up because it's the largest branch of the military. The weakest link is back with a new host Welcome. So the weakest think his international game show the weakest link is back. Only this time. The show will be fronted by Jane Lynch, who is also the executive producer. The rapid Fire quiz show premieres on NBC Tuesday with some upgrades. The new version will keep the same pace of the British import with contestants answering general knowledge questions, then. At the end of the tramp. They vote off who they perceived to be The.

Jared Halpern Jane Lynch Senate Nancy Pelosi Steve Mnuchin Fox News Executive Producer Army NBC
President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett as Democrats threaten to slow down the process

Bob Brinker's Money Talk

02:09 min | 1 d ago

President Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett as Democrats threaten to slow down the process

"News in Cleveland. We're live on the campus of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland Clinic, the site of the first debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden moderated by our very own Chris Wallace, who is preparing today. A Supreme Court vacancy. President Trump's third and his selection of Judge Jamie Cockney Barrett as his nominee. At a new twist to Tuesday night's debate will begin with Fox team coverage. Marc Maron is at the White House and Jackie Heinrich and Woman Delaware. Let's start with the latest on the president's Supreme Court pick and what we know about the timeline for a confirmation process, Mark President Trump hopes to fire up his base with his new Supreme Court nominee. But with election day fast approaching, the White House knows getting Judge Baird confirmed by the Senate will be contentious. It is a very proud moment. Indeed, lead Saturday, President Trump made it official. He's nominating seventh Circuit Appeals Court Judge Amy Barrett to the Supreme Court. She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution. A favorite of the conservative establishment is a practicing Catholic graduate of Notre Dame and former clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. History, social philosophy is mined to a judge must apply the law as written. Democrats are outraged. Republicans air pushing barrettes nomination Ford just five weeks before the election after Republicans blocked President Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for the same reason in 2016. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says Democrats are concerned with Barrett's record on abortion and religion. I will strongly strongly strongly oppose his nomination. Two GOP senators say they will not vote on the nominee before the election. But the majority of Republicans appear ready to hold hearings and Senate Judiciary Committee chair Lindsey Graham says his committee old four days of confirmation hearings beginning the week of October. 12th. The president told reporters last night he thinks Barrett's confirmation will move fairly fast and that he believes the confirmation vote. Britt will happen before Election Day. Marc Maron is reporting for the White House. Thank you, Mark. Now let's turn to

Judge Jamie Cockney Barrett President Trump Supreme Court Mark President Trump White House Marc Maron Senate Judiciary Committee Cleveland Judge Baird Circuit Appeals Court Case Western Reserve Universit Cleveland Clinic Senate Justice Antonin Scalia Chris Wallace Joe Biden Notre Dame
Fresh update on "senate" discussed on  Investor's Edge

Investor's Edge

00:30 min | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on Investor's Edge

"In D C and uses Chris Barnes has more around 60,000 people prayed on the National Mall is part of the 2020 prayer march, led by the Reverend Franklin Graham. He says he organized the rally to try to heal America, saying people are divided amid feelings of fear and uncertainty. Also on hand and addressing the crowd was Vice President Mike Pence. He offered prayers for those who have suffered through or died from the cove. It 18 virus. He also wanted to remember those who are on the front lines of fighting. It. Pray for our doctors and nurses and all of those that are bringing America through this challenging time for us to radio news. I'm Chris Barnes. President Trump announced Judge Amy Cody buried as his nominee for the Supreme Court seat left vacant by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. DEATH Last week, Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham announced the confirmation hearings would begin on October. 12 this Use a radio news. At the American Veterinary Medical Association annual convention in Washington, D. C. I spoke with Dr John How Avia May President About one. Health health is.

Franklin Graham Mike Pence Chris Barnes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Vice President America Lindsey Graham President Trump Senate Judiciary National Mall American Veterinary Medical As Supreme Court Dr John Amy Cody Washington
Trump: "Definitely time for a woman” on Supreme Court

AP News Radio

00:51 sec | 1 d ago

Trump: "Definitely time for a woman” on Supreme Court

"As judge Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court heads to the Senate the rhetoric is ramping up I urge lawmakers and members of the media to refrain from personal or partisan attacks president trump called on Democrats to give Amy Coney Barrett a respectful and dignified hearing for her part the judge recalled the friendship between justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia philosophical rival arguments even about matters of great consequence need not destroy affection but Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer was blunt per view is our way to the right of the American people and as they learn about it she will become less and less popular the far left will practice a bream court with radicals in the president returned to rally mode in the campaign appearance in Pennsylvania right the words under god from my diligence in Thomas Washington

Amy Coney Barrett Senate Ruth Bader Ginsburg Antonin Scalia President Trump Pennsylvania Thomas Washington Supreme Court Chuck Schumer
Fresh update on "senate" discussed on 10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

01:23 min | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "senate" discussed on 10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

"When's news time 11 49 Joe Biden's running mate, Kamala Harris, is urging voters not to be discouraged by Republican efforts to fill a Supreme Court seat before the election, Harris says she knows everybody's tired. That's how Republican leaders want it. They want you to feel like your fight. Doesn't matter. But in swing state, North Carolina, Harris says Democrats will not give up or give in. We will not let the infection that President Trump has injected into the presidency and into Congress. That has paralyzed our politics and pitted Americans against each other. Spread to the United States Supreme Court. Harris sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which means she will play a direct role in the Amy Cockney Barrett confirmation fight. Starting in two weeks. The Senate's never confirmed a high court nominee so close to an election. Soccer Megane Washington, Amy Cockney Barrett is scheduled to start courtesy calls with senators tomorrow. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham will be among the first senators to meet with Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney Barrett, his office announced Monday, Two days after President Trump announced the circuit judge has his choice to succeed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Graham and Barrett will meet at the capital Tuesday afternoon. Two weeks ahead of when Graham announced confirmation hearings for the judge will begin. Several Democrats protesting the nomination, including minority leader Chuck Schumer, have said they will not meet with Barrett. But thus far, Democrats continue to lack the votes needed to block her appointment. Correspondent Adam Kelsey With the two Nothing win over the Della Stars, the Tampa Bay Lightning or the 2020 Stanley Cup champions, beating Dallas in six games. The NHL restarted that season in August after the pandemic forced of five month pause. Playoff games were held inside so called Corona virus Bubbles in Toronto and Edmonton. Wins news time 11 51 time for traffic.

Amy Cockney Barrett Kamala Harris United States Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham President Trump Senate Joe Biden Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Chuck Schumer North Carolina NHL Megane Washington Congress Toronto Tampa Bay Lightning Adam Kelsey Della Stars Edmonton
Trump introduces his Supreme Court pick, Senators react

WBZ Afternoon News

01:47 min | 1 d ago

Trump introduces his Supreme Court pick, Senators react

"Us. I'm teeny gal. Here's what's happening. President Trump announcing appellate court Judge Amy Cockney buried as his pig for the Supreme Court. The president called buried one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds. This sets off a scramble by the Republicans to confirm Judge Barrett before election Day in less than six weeks. CBS NEWS Political contributor Peter Mayer says that Democrats are very frustrated and unhappy. About this rushed proceedings are already Democrats who've served notice that there not even planning to meet with her because they reject the process itself that President Trump has used They have bitter memories of the way. The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, blocked Judge Merrick Garland back in February of 2016 months before the election that year, saying that the next president should decide, and the Senate Judiciary Committee, at least according to one Republican source will begin confirmation hearings for Amy Cockney Barrett. On October 12 reaction to the president's election from across the congressional spectrum, former Massachusetts governor and now Utah Senator at MIT, Romney calling Judge Barrett Ah, highly respected jurist, and he looks forward to meeting with her to review her credentials. New Hampshire Senator Maggie Hassan says the nomination should be seen for exactly what it is. She says, an attempt to overturn the affordable care act. She also strongly opposes the ongoing efforts of the president and majority leader, Mitch McConnell to push to approve Judge Amy County Barrett rather than work on passing a new covert 19 release bill. Meanwhile, Senator Elizabeth Warren says Americans cannot stand down while the president tries to hand the country's highest cord and the rights and liberties of the people. Over to the quote

Judge Amy County Barrett President Trump Judge Amy Cockney Senator Maggie Hassan Mitch Mcconnell Judge Barrett Ah Senator Elizabeth Warren Judge Merrick Garland Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Senator Peter Mayer CBS New Hampshire Massachusetts Romney
Amy Coney Barrett to Senate: I look forward to working with you during the confirmation process

For The Defense with Attorney Brad Koffel

00:33 sec | 1 d ago

Amy Coney Barrett to Senate: I look forward to working with you during the confirmation process

"Trump is officially nominated Amy Cockney Barrett to replace the seat held by Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Washington is bracing for what could be a bruising confirmation in the Senate. ABC. White House correspondent Rachel Scott, The devout Catholic, has strong support among religious conservatives and anti abortion activists, and she's already bracing for a tough fight ahead. I have no illusions that the road ahead of me will be easy, either for the short term or the long haul. Members of the United States Senate. I look forward to working with you during the confirmation process. More

United States Senate Ruth Bader Ginsburg Amy Cockney Barrett White House Correspondent Supreme Court Rachel Scott Donald Trump ABC Washington
Supreme Court battle pivots to future of Obamacare

Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

00:27 sec | 1 d ago

Supreme Court battle pivots to future of Obamacare

"If Judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed Democrats fear Obamacare and abortion rights will be abolished. Women's reproductive freedom will be at Risk Roe v Wade itself will be at risk. She's on the court I believe that will either be eliminator is so greatly constricted that in effect it's eliminated Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Senate Republicans hope to make quick work. The nomination confirmation hearings are scheduled to start on. October

Judge Amy Coney Barrett Chuck Schumer Senate ROE Wade
Trump: Barrett 'a woman of unparalleled achievement'

The Morgan Show with Morgan White, Jr.

00:29 sec | 1 d ago

Trump: Barrett 'a woman of unparalleled achievement'

"Cockney Barrett to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. It is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court. She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials. And unyielding loyalty to the constitution. The Senate confirmation hearings will begin two weeks from Monday. October. 12th and LOL a man is in critical condition after

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court Cockney Barrett Senate
Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominates conservative favourite for Supreme Court

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

03:01 min | 1 d ago

Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominates conservative favourite for Supreme Court

"Trump Trump picked picked Amy Amy Cockney Cockney Barrett Barrett yesterday yesterday to to fill fill Ruth Ruth Bader Bader Ginsburg Ginsburg empty seat. The federal appeals court judge also got high praise from him. President Trump made that announcement at the White House yesterday. Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant And gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court. She is a woman of unparalleled achievement. Powering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution Judge Amy Cockney Barrett. There. It was there in person with her family to accept that nomination and pays tribute to the woman chief replace Should I be confirmed? I will be mindful of who came before me. The flag of the United States is still flying at half staff and memory of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to mark the end of a great American life. Justice Ginsburg began her career at a time when women were not welcome in the legal profession. But she not only broke glass ceilings, she smashed them. Well, that's it. Ginsberg's the legacy of Expanding women's rights is pretty much the opposite of judge barrettes. She is deeply conservative and is a favorite of the religious right. She's from Marlins and has a law degree from Notre Dame. Bear. Its presence on the court will give conservative leaning justices a solid majority, and critics say that could take Obama care and the DACA program while threatening LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights. Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer. My colleagues are united in opposition. Many of them have issued statements in opposition. And we are united. Democratshouse Senate and Joe Biden. And show in alerting the American people to the danger danger to their health care. They're very healthcare they depend on with this nomination. The court will hear a challenge to Obamacare next month, one that could take away guaranteed coverage for anyone with a pre existing condition. Covert 19 would likely apply and well, we're in the middle of a global health crisis. Barrettes nomination is expected to be quickly confirmed in the Senate. But as correspondent Karen Travers report now that President Trump has made this nomination official the action moves to Capitol Hill, where there will likely be a very bitter confirmation fight president today acknowledged to the senators who were in the Rose Garden that they could have a tough time on their hands. Very quick. I'm sure it'll be extremely non controversial, A new poll from ABC News in The Washington Post found. 57% of Americans say the Supreme Court vacancy should be filled by the winner of the November election with a vote in the Senate next year. Just 38% say they prefer to see President Trump and the current Senate Act on a nomination. nomination. Majority Majority leader leader Mitch Mitch McConnell McConnell says says he he wants wants to to confirm confirm Barrett Barrett before before election election Day. Day. Republicans Republicans are are looking looking at at October October 12 12 to to begin begin barrettes barrettes confirmation hearings right now.

President Trump Ruth Ruth Bader Bader Ginsburg Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court Senate Mitch Mitch Mcconnell Mcconnel Barrett Barrett Amy Amy Cockney Ginsberg United States Chuck Schumer White House Joe Biden Abc News Marlins
Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominates conservative favourite for Supreme Court

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

01:33 min | 2 d ago

Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominates conservative favourite for Supreme Court

"It's been barely a week since the death of Ruth Baby Bater Ginsberg. But President Trump has already decided who we'd like to see replace her. He announced today that he'll nominate federal appeals Court Judge Amy Cockney Barrett for Ginsburg seat on the U. S Supreme Court at an event at the White House Rose Garden. President. Trump said he expects Barrett to win quick confirmation in the Senate, which of course, is controlled by the president's fellow Republicans. There should be a straightforward and prompt Confirmation should be very easy. Good luck. It's going to be very quick. I'm sure it'll be extremely noncontroversial. He said that the last time didn't weigh. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is signaled a desire to seat Barrett before election Day. Multiple sources say Republicans they're targeting the week of October 12 for her confirmation hearing. Barrett described her legal philosophy has she accepted the nomination today? Judge must apply the law as written. Judges are not policy makers, and they must be resolute and setting aside any policy views they might hold. And that was Barrett, speaking at the at the announcement today she's a deeply conservative jurist who is a favorite of the religious right often compared to the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Liberal critics say Our presence on the court threatens the future of Obamacare. Abortion rights, LGBTQ rights in war. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden tweeted today that Barrett is quote a jurist with a written track record of disagreeing with the court's decision to uphold the affordable Care act, he adds quote votes like health care. Vote, rather like your healthcare is on the ballot because it is

Court Judge Amy Cockney Barret President Trump U. S Supreme Court Supreme Court Ruth Baby Bater Ginsberg Senate Justice Antonin Scalia White House Rose Garden Joe Biden Mitch Mcconnell Ginsburg
Trump selects Amy Coney Barrett for supreme court

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

01:28 min | 2 d ago

Trump selects Amy Coney Barrett for supreme court

"President Trump that the White House today nominating federal judge Amy Cockney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Cody Barrett currently sits on the seventh Circuit Federal Court of Appeals after the president appointed her in 2017. Correspondent Michelle Fransen has Mohr on the nominees, Life and Career Federal Judge Amy Cockney. Barrett is a favorite among most conservative groups. She's a devout Catholic and mother of seven. She grew up in New Orleans and attended Notre Dame Law School Judge Amy Tony Baron After President Trump announced her as his choice. She also spoke thanking the president and noting that she won't forget the seat. She is set to replace of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But she not only broke glass ceilings, she smashed them. If confirmed, Cockney, Barrett is likely to take up the affordable care act, reproduction rights and faith rights cases that could shift the balance of the nation's highest court. The announcement came in a formal ceremony today at the Rose calm. Cardinal Trump is said to have the greatest impact on the Supreme Court since Ronald Reagan, who also made three appointments, and Democrats worry. The addition of Amy Cockney Barrett to the bench would drag American jurisprudence inextricably to the right, putting abortion rights and civil rights at risk. If she is confirmed by the Senate by Election Day, As Republicans expect, Barrett would have a crucial vote on the future of the affordable care act. The latest challenge to the laws. Constitutionality goes before Justice is on November 10th.

Amy Cockney Barrett Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cardinal Trump Judge Amy Cockney President Trump Supreme Court Judge Amy Tony Baron Circuit Federal Court Of Appea Notre Dame Law School White House Ronald Reagan Michelle Fransen New Orleans Senate Mohr
Aviation industry rocked by furloughs amid COVID-19 pandemic

KYW 24 Hour News

01:15 min | 2 d ago

Aviation industry rocked by furloughs amid COVID-19 pandemic

"And the aviation industry was among the hardest hit by the Corona virus pandemic, and for months, government support has kept many airlines from furloughing or laying off their employees. But that support is coming to an end. CBS NEWS Chris Van Cleve has the story American started the year is the world's largest airline with about 140,000 Employees Cove it has devastated its business. On the government's payroll support program runs out next week. American will be 30% smaller overnight, 19,000 will lose their jobs and 15 cities will lose their service CEO Doug Parker. I just can't believe The winning, We may not be able to do the right thing simply because our elected officials can't come to any sort of compromise agreement. In a show of unity outside the capital this week, airline CEOs, union leaders and employees pleaded with Congress for another 25 billion in payroll support to halt as many as 76,000 furloughs and layoffs. Through at least march. This is really people. Moving their stuff into their cars and trying to figure out how to survive. There is rare bipartisan support in Congress and the White House that something should be done. But a covert relief package remains stalled, as is a Senate bill. Focus solely on airline aid. Chris Van Cleve Washington

Chris Van Cleve Washington Chris Van Cleve Congress Doug Parker CBS CEO Senate White House
Trump announces Amy Coney Barrett as nominee for Supreme Court seat

The Boom X Show with Darol Tuttle

00:40 sec | 2 d ago

Trump announces Amy Coney Barrett as nominee for Supreme Court seat

"President Trump has formally nominated Amy Cockney Barrett to the Supreme Court this afternoon Comas Jeff Pooja has more on what it means for the bench. Amy Kuney Baron has been a federal court judge for only three years. But in that time she's made a name for herself among conservative groups. A devout Catholic and favorite of the religious right. Barrett is expected to be a reliable voice in the effort to overturn Roe v. Wade like Justice Thomas, who's already on the court. Is going to be someone who is going to be prepared to get a fresh look at a lot of presidency, disagrees. That's Andrew Siegel, associate dean of the law school at Seattle University. Her nomination is likely to set up a bitter fight in the U. S. Senate

Amy Cockney Barrett Amy Kuney Baron Supreme Court President Trump Jeff Pooja Andrew Siegel Associate Dean U. S. Senate Justice Thomas ROE Wade Seattle University
President Trump to announce his Supreme Court pick

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

01:21 min | 2 d ago

President Trump to announce his Supreme Court pick

"Some pretty heated partisan back and forth at Senate Judiciary Committee hearings in the coming days, most probably launch into full moat later today, when the president is expected to announce his selection to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg slated for on five this afternoon. 10 10 winds will bring it to you live. One name in particular said to be rising to the top As one poll shows, though some people feel how do they feel about that happening before the election? President Trump expected to pick Judge Amy Cockney Barrett as his nominee to fill Justice Ginsburg seats we're going to be naming the nominee hopefully will be on that court for 50 years. Five THISS despite a new ABC News Washington Post poll, Finding by a wide margin, most Americans say The winner of the election should fill the vacancy and a Senate vote should happen next year That is correspondent Kristine Sloan with the story. Meantime, Democrats responded to all this. During their weekly Democratic address, Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio, criticizing Republicans for their lack of he put it of handling the pandemic. And then the appointment of a new judge of the Supreme Court. Months of an action they're willing to drop everything they're willing to move heaven and earth to put another corporate special interest judge on the Supreme again the president expected to make his announcement on 5 p.m. today keep it locked here on 10 10 wins, We will bring you that announcement. Live

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court President Trump Senator Sherrod Brown Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Kristine Sloan Abc News Washington Post Ohio
Trump Expected To Nominate Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme Court

Joan Hamburg

01:20 min | 2 d ago

Trump Expected To Nominate Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme Court

"Sources tell Fox News that Judge Amy Cockney Barrett is President Trump's pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who passed away last week and announcement is expected at 5 P.m. Eastern. After that, senators on both sides will prepare for a contentious confirmation process. This is going to be like the Brett Kavanaugh process on steroids. Republicans were willing to forge ahead once it was clear that they had at least 51 votes to do this. And the Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell is already criticizing Democrats for having made up their minds every single time, Madam president, no matter how upstanding no matter how qualified no matter their views, no matter their record, every nominee gets the same insane treatment. So long as the president who nominated them is not a Democrat, the Senate confirmed. Amy Cockney Barrett in 2017 for the seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Fox's Chad program. Democrats call the confirmation effort a Republican power grab since the election is just 38 days away this as the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden keeps his list of potential Supreme Court contenders under wraps. Biden's justification for refusing to name his Supreme Court list ahead of the election. He says it could subject a candidate to personal attacks. Judges on his leads to Mayfield influence in writing their opinions boxes, which Edson

Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Joe Biden President Trump Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Senate Brett Kavanaugh Circuit Court Of Appeals Fox News Mitch Mcconnell Donald Trump FOX Edson Mayfield
Majority says winner of presidential election should nominate next Supreme Court justice

This Morning with Gordon Deal

00:47 sec | 2 d ago

Majority says winner of presidential election should nominate next Supreme Court justice

"Trump will formally nominate conservative Appeals Court Judge Amy Cockney Barry to the U. S. Supreme Court today. Meantime, a new ABC News Washington Post poll on whether President Trump should nominate the justice right now at all, confirm now or wait for the results of the election. Republicans indicating they want a new Supreme Court justice seated as soon as possible. But a new ABC NEWS Washington Post poll showing by nearly 20% margin Americans say replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the high court should be left to the winner of the presidential election. 57% Wanna wait 38% say fill the seat now. But Americans who were pulled also not keen on the idea of Democrats, adding another justice to the court. Should they win a Senate majority and the White House 54% opposing that only 32% favoring stacking the court. Dave Packer ABC NEWS A

U. S. Supreme Court Donald Trump Abc News Judge Amy Cockney Barry Ruth Bader Ginsburg Washington Post ABC Dave Packer Senate President Trump White House
Apple's Beta Effect

9to5Mac Happy Hour

04:35 min | 3 d ago

Apple's Beta Effect

"Have my notes, the Beta effect to talk about, and what that is is with with with going from fourteen fourteen to fourteen one, which we believe made for iphone twelve, and that's why we're not getting that. We also believe fourteen to was made before the final version of fourteen point zero and so when you update to fourteen point to. You can't use the new blood oxygen sensor APP on the Apple Watch because it requires your phone to have the version to do something with the data and so my watch on seven point zero watch os before was on fourteen two I couldn't do the oxygen singer tests I. Guess You have to accept the health disclaimers and stuff upfront right? That's probably and it saves it there too like the background. Readings where they go. So I think should say it must save on your watch before like if you're out and about without your phone, it's back into some pretty sure and then he just sinks him up. Right. Yeah. Yeah. So but it's like ekg where you've gotta you've gotTa have the version match up to support it and we need when you like started in the health app on the phone does it Does have that like. Explain urine like disclaimers like it does when you do EKG yeah I don't recall I. Mean there is an I button for information on the readout on the watch explains thing like ninety and above is pretty good. You've got kind of hunt for it to find that I think it should be like under the readout not at an disclosure button but I think. The reason is they didn't get medical sign off on the sensor because they call a wellness not medical, right? Yeah. So they have to be very careful about how they present this information and we respect about spending Keno after the show like. is kind of silly at the moment you just get this number and then you're kind of left your and devices about what to do about it but they haven't go FDA approved the weather you know the necessary. Regulatory. Accreditation they need to be able to make more defined choices like they can with Iki the cagey where if it does detect potential arrhythmia a directly sound on the screen you know go talk to your doctor about it like they don't have that same flexibility with with the blackhawks jeans and that's why in the event they would say like we aren't doing studies about blood oxygen and Covid, nineteen. The Apple Watch has a blood oxygen sensor lie they never would linked together because. The purchase self. So the the APP on the watch is very nice I. Mean we saw the animation from the event on seeing it in person it's lovely. It's blue and red. It's like blood arteries. And it as fifteen seconds to run it to do an like an act of measurement and. As you near like say three seconds it becomes it begins to form a circle of completion and it's just so delightful. How how looks You do see the last. Measurement in the APP itself. So if you go just launch it, you'll see the last say passive measurement that picked up. So you might say like when our three hours ago. And That's neat. So it's more data than than just here do or read out. Your readings to be like. Consistent enough that you think it's good because I've seen some reviews like I've been getting some resource I get ninety, six, hundred lights will have the place. So I don't really trust it. Yeah. Well. Not How to. Read. Out. That was like you're below ninety. And then I had one that was like you're you're in the ninety range than I would maybe be concerned but I've seen the rains be from ninety three to one hundred back to back tends to be pretty consistent for me. Washington Post. They had an issue where they tried different watches and bands and just could not it to work the right way have had that experience. Sensor depends on like your skin and You know. The Senate doesn't work if you've got tattoos for instance so. Different reasons and stuff like transparent basically. So it's you know. No Job for it. And if there was an issue like despite being review watched, that's the point of this talk about the experience I would mention in trust me. I mean lot with the series five hours of disinterested and reviewing because of an issue that had which I read about instead. Of. The. Battery Life So. I've been on this one fine. Yeah. A lot of people have have had shoes with seven on their existing watches having less better life than they had before I have had that and I don't know what the clear processes take restores instead of his new

Apple IKI Washington Post Blackhawks Senate FDA
US House Democrats Crafting New $2.2 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Package

Squawk Pod

02:44 min | 3 d ago

US House Democrats Crafting New $2.2 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Package

"House. Democrats are preparing smaller corona virus for the leaf package. All right. So it's a trillion dollars less than their last proposal, but a trillion dollars more than what Republicans are ready to do. So they split. That More, but roughly, so they split the difference source tells us that the two point four trillion dollar package would include enhanced unemployment insurance stimulus checks, small business loans, and aid to airlines, and it says here you can talk to the right or the price tag is still about a trillion dollars more than the Republicans latest offer. But. But thought the skinny deal was something like seven or eight, hundred, billion dollars trillion dollars. Rounding now I think and I. Know They are in Congress Lana rounding lot around rounding going on. In fact, they probably call this isn't there I mean if you're. Just, a couple of hundred billion. So why not round that around? That's right well like we really have to pay. Right it the idea that it looks like they're getting closer together but not really I, mean, they're still talking about a massive difference between the two sides and I don't think there's much chance Manuchehr yesterday they're ready to restart talks but didn't give a timetable for any of that and I don't see how this happens before the election I just don't. Probably not and. I think both it's weird because I think. I mean you saw Goldman Sachs yesterday for for GDP for not the third quarter but for the fourth quarter from six to three. Based on. You know not having prospects for more stimulus so I can tell you that. The election will be over but I think the administration would like six percent a lot more to be able to brag about that although we're going to get that flash number for third quarter which should be. Twenty plus. like two weeks before a week and a half before the election. So you're going to hear how great debt is biggest-ever I guess twenty, three, twenty, four percents we heard from Brian Moynihan yesterday who said that you should have additional aid, but it should be targeted the Democrats in this latest thing that they've put forth still have payments going directly to people you know payments across the board president trump has mentioned that be something he'd be interested in but I think it. Makes a lot of sense and and this is something you would probably hear from most of the Republicans with the smaller in the Senate with the smaller package that they've signed off on the idea of sending a blank check to ever sending a check to everybody regardless of whether or not you've been impacted on this. We'll probably pass the time of needing to do something like that. You need to get it to the businesses into the people who are suffering the most right now. Yes greed agreed.

Goldman Sachs Donald Trump Brian Moynihan Senate Lana Manuchehr President Trump
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

02:05 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"It's consistent. That's a good point. I'm good. Finally found something. It'd be a candidate for. Leisure yes. It's true. Steve. You have a link of a blank slate to also blind. Again, I'm the moderator I'm not the Karl. Rove. Warthog Karl Rove how hard core right wing is warthog. I would have said very before the girlfriend. Softening a bit. Yeah. He was very, very big liberal. He's a trump guy is all. Yeah. She's definitely more liberal. Yeah. I'll take it with me as well. Hopefully. There you go. So mikey run for Senate and I think I think this is GonNa be the story of the day. I. Think that the mini and get behind this while you can tell already phone calls people people are donating. Speech some advertising could to another eight thousand words from that child Astra to Jesus Five I. Want Five Thousand Votes from my gun election day five, thousand votes are dangling incentive out there perhaps a live show or oh, it's true or something. Weekend. Content. But it'd be nice. Steve No. We'd be talking about that. You were my got you work with this guy on the moderator vote going to be a neutral party. But in the real ones, I would say I beat the benefit. Yeah. Once the general election, would you thinking to moderate the actual between honor gear in the mark? And he do a good job and. You're GonNa meet, and the other two. Brow Ian Keller, and all these you know don't you think they're gonNA have the the neutral voices of Massachusetts this they're going to have these. Old White men do this. So another old white men can get a man can get elected. I am happy to criticize that and others won't I suppose. campaign rolls on into tomorrow, and we'll talk you then. This was pretty reprehensible. I don't know how it can be anybody's idea of humor..

Karl Rove Steve No Ian Keller Senate mikey Massachusetts
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

01:54 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"It to use nuts much I. Watch them I guess a lot of one time I was the end of the show is Wednesday Christie I can't see your so liberal at the flushing what's going on here? You kidding me of being a liberal yes flushing. Only. Do it quickly because I think this emperor's fans I'll do it quickly can ideal town. Jersey. Nora you. I don't even know I can't do it to they'll do it some other time. Much work. I mean you'll never do it now. Again. It's a fair question. I think. I Apologize. Like. Is it true you're running for Senate Dan Rather. So I'm also from East saw meadow I'm born and raised currently living here I was curious where you would rank yourself among famous from metal. It's a good question. My neighbor was Nick Ahmed. For the Arizona diamondbacks wow and then. There was another girl. who was a couple years older than me? I think wrote a series of books. if I'm not mistaken remember her Victoria something. Red The red queen. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah so those two definitely more. Than know any other famous over Florida panthers saying. Frank for Toronto. Berkeley for the Bruins. What's that Steve How about Beyond the grave. Shift, a fuck up. Wait, times materialistic. Michelle. This listing people listening nobody's No. No. One of the best shortstops they've never heard that person uneven. Defensive..

Dan Rather Nick Ahmed Nora Michelle Senate panthers Victoria Florida Arizona Toronto Bruins Berkeley Steve Frank
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

02:37 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"I'm feeling. Well I got up. I ask them in a fan but I gotta give my opinion wiping from the ranch when your poop is weird. Okay, I. Think a lot of stuff I destroy a Lotta bathroom I just ask. Allison. What's your? What's your policy? Shut up Jeff. Jeff. What's your policy on? Using, toilet paper. Kirk. If it's fair I gotta use it. Sure. Dom God I take as much of the way as you can. I one wipe guy if I can bring my wife I, will if I don't then I'll you all the rolls of toilet paper in the thought don't no one else can you all right jeff? You. Differently No. I 'cause I. I won't be some reason for as well. Well, there was accusations were levied the Jeff and I'm not sure it's fair. There was a smear entercom for awhile. Yes see I told what a fucking disgusting shithole place that there was the worst place on earth. You go those clogging situation no now that happened to. So the entire floor, there was a third floor at twenty yesterday. was there are was there? You know there was. One toilet in the entire fucking floor. into one urinal. To shooters. Two year I remember shooters in one year. Yeah I. think that's right. Right. If you go in there, you take a piss. First of all it's smelling shabby three shooters in one year that was to. Go downstairs to the second floor at a decent bathroom. You go in there and of course, lb would be in there taking a shit just talking here. What's up man? Yeah. Let's just be shitting away. But for a while somebody and it was rumored to be Jeff I don't think that's track. Don't think that's true. was smearing because he wouldn't do them smearing shit on the walls. Walk in there and you say that, shit, it was above the urinal we say we'd call Jerry. We can do shit like above the urinal this happened in my high school someone. Someone wrote Poop Poop. And then there was an inquisition to figure out who was this mirror I came into comment like the culmination of this big debate because one of my buddies who just started around the same time as first day was being walked down the hallway then walks past Phil Zachary's office to a Jeff Kunar screaming I.

Jeff Kunar Allison Phil Zachary Kirk Jerry lb
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

03:04 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"Go I slice. Give us give a piece of Pie you see digital targeting is so advanced now that we can find the Italian voters in have just like the. True mean to slice of pizza with this cross out. The to really do a whole bunch of ads targeting every ethnic. Stopping. Even even the Vietnamese areas go. Goes right about. This. Uprising Michael Point twelve percent in Massachusetts. Berkman, hand is trying to sabotage democracy. Elections right-wing election manipulation over any of these idiots over this one, right? Yes but I would say look I mean. Cynthia dill ran for United States Senate that's what I'm saying. Like twenty something percent of the vote I. Mean I think if we do this? Endorsement, we push it. ooh, true. Mike at five thousand votes election day right in boats five. Yes. Yes I think we do need though. Sorry zero thing we're going to do people want this all the time. We need people to register to vote I was GonNa say I feel a lot of my voters may be unregistered? Yes. Also illiterate. People. Right in your natural. Probably. Some different variations fat. Fat Fuck is not going to help us we need we need the name Mike Gear blind like, yes I, think you're going to get five thousand votes five thousand that's big for seven. I appreciate the so you're endorsing me officially the deadline. Doing that. The other candidates. So Connor I think the deadline to register to vote is Saturday October twenty fourth. Aren't. So get out there are we did they want us to. This. My friends, Rian Fran getting get out there register and vote make a difference right now they don't want people to register to vote as well. I do make a real difference out there and get a real change. You want real change in. Washington. GonNa get with my curious senator. I mean, you know. I'll be I'll be driving I'll be driving unregistered voters I just thought of the worst part of it. Steve is if he wins, he's got to leave the show. I with yes. You can't. You can't do everything you're down in Washington fighting for your constituents of course, right? Dead. The sacrifice that get some of these shows like Jim Bradley of the Senators and go. We can't Mike Connors route. He's talking about the issues take calls you know. He's totally try and bag AFC. Completely. Well, Hey, listen. Much. More. She really looks younger than she is. Understands if I'm going to have a career in politics, I need to look the part as well. Sure I understand what this is exciting. This is exciting. Maybe, mills getting a nice suit for these debates hopes. That we know that I think he's going to have to have smugly on Mike in the mid offense get advice on how to run a senatorial campaign. That's. Maybe But that's the. But Yeah Mills, the.

Jim Bradley Mike Mike Gear mills Rian Fran Washington Mike Connors Cynthia dill United States Senate Massachusetts Michael Point senator Berkman Connor Steve AFC hand
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

04:18 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"Party. Patrick we're both is true. Medicine. The Pizza. Party. A was at one point was a registered partway. We know could run. The both the other candidates right win. The Prohibition Party I don't think that's a good fit for my now and I. Think. He'd be like Pelosi. Pictures Drinking. They a private. The. Not Ten. Not Downsizing I. don't even know the fuck that means somebody are there. Like eighteen twenty okay Jesus. Veterans Party I. Don't think that'll work Albright this thing. That's true. Yeah. Probably not probably not he may be a blinded in Iraq. Brothers some. That twelve visions party. Well, that's. That's almost is that true? That's too easy. This is Pizza Pie. Vision only got one. American according to the WIKIPEDIA. There There's real as any third party can't. That's true. That's true. The last one that I think might make sense as the world's citizens party okay. If we're appealing to the Cambridge Somerville. Bronzes speaking. Get that one the pirate party. Heats, pirating says it's Back To combine them all for different to write. In thing, he could form his own party Mike with a patch on eating pizza and banging his mom. That's. Great poster to me Barcelona mates please. Post sells let's. Let's throw it. You said the number one thousand let's say thousand votes would they say unlike local Boston? Write in candidate. Mike what we will do is the day after the election file for a public records request can get the total the vote totals. You love these fucking stiff announcers having to sit Michael Geary of the. Twelve hundred votes benefit spoiler when you say John. What are your thoughts? There's a passionate group out there that believe in civil liberties, and in this I mean, this is you know this shows the youth of America is really looking for change misconstrue. Picture. Of and megawatts. Close. So close race that'd be so great twenty, five years from now the movement is spread across the country incest is legal everywhere. President four terms he's FDR. That's changed everything. My opponent is attacking me going at this is a joke but it is turned into something very real. My opponent Jerry believes the brother and sister should not have SAS. Lunatic. Hello. The nine, hundred, ninety s called they want their morality do. We great ads for this I think this is going to happen now. All right. I think this is going to happen I. AM proposing Mike Erie runs for whiz running again Senate says okay although he can't be senator but again we're it's that You. Her old in office. You'll see a young you know those. Commercials the guys on the football again the Commercial Mike Geogra- street Miami. Young visit camelot all over again a vote for. Vote for this motherfucker. I mean, this is this is a great candidate. Vote for mayhem. Yes. Yes. What is your take right now I'm Liz, your take on international trade. Enough of it already you know, right? Yes. Exactly. That's exactly right. Right. Steve Been Too much. I'll be working to get the minimum wage you minimum wage bumped up to twenty five dollars an hour. Okay. Popular pay for that. Are the small business, GonNa pay for that Printer Gobert. Tough time in. Turn per now's the time. For. ME. It already. So why not just print more right Mike I'm here campaign money. Exactly. Attention now, now's the time. What is your relationship with the Prime Minister in? Russia. It was a slip. These things you have to answer those. Moments later you have to. You have to answer these questions. Do I know what's the thing that libertarian got wrong a couple years ago. Pillow.

Prohibition Party Mike America Mike Erie pirate party Albright Pelosi Patrick Cambridge Somerville Mike Geogra Boston Michael Geary Prime Minister Barcelona Iraq WIKIPEDIA Russia President Jerry Liz
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

03:52 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"Was Matt was just a massive figure in their life. So they it you know my dad never let us for for Teddy, Kennedy but like the name meant something means nothing to me and I think namings even less to you mean nothing to nothing the next generation like Harry won't know they were significant here. Than definitely yeah. I, mean, they're your parents grew up in a time when people would have printed out framed pictures of Jack Kennedy hanging there died in their kitchen. It was like their grandchildren, Jesus? It was like, yeah. The priests would come by and have dinner with them and then you know the parents would go upstairs and hang out with the kids the good old days, I well, Jack Kennedy looked on. Yeah. That's true. The word hug actually had a JFK poster in our dorm freshman year really very odd. When I moved in yeah, and he's a Republican as well. So it was very fucking firebrand Republican that begins brain of his. He's very smart guy actually, GonNa be your campaign manager that would make a lot of sense. Yeah. Would it sure would? Well I can't I can't be I can't be as Karl. Rove I'm GonNa moderate the debates, right? Really. George. Go the other way. Mike is not. So apart, you'd be running I mean are you going to? It's going to be an independent or Green Party or a? Party is that I don't know that it's a party Steve. Google incest parties. Party is a party that that. Why don't you start that I? Guess we could I don't know. Michael Geary of incest. The first thing that comes up that could be my only only. Understand but you know when you when you search for Incest Party of the first thing that comes up is X. Videos incestuous family part I do just Mike. Pointing at. Someone's. Someone's actually registered a domain name that's incest porn dot party. Oh. That's terrible. Insists party. Dutt. Commerce? DOT INCEST PARTY DOT COM is to closest come. Party. Doesn't work. Steve Hardy Dot. Nope we. Should that. Somebody else. This is excited must be excited. I'm very excited. Yes. Who is going to be here is going to be Warthog or Steve or you can have a team of running team of rivals really no. Is your is your brains as your you know. Okay. So here. I understand you're on your own man. List of political parties in Massachusetts say what? Steve should not be vice president. Vice President Warriors behind the opera great vice presidential candidate. No and I wouldn't want to go with a guy like Ted because I think that would. You Disabled? You've got put it frankly well, it also rather seventy percent Huddleston will be a great VPN he's. He's running for Senate though I thought who is Mike Always be Senate. That's why not ran for president though. I WANNA make. A THIRTY FIVE THIRTY FIVE I run for Senate. Fine. All Right, fine. Senate and then for a few years, we'll revisit course going to be a senator from. We have to get to be on the ballot well, no, he won't be on the ballot. Now where we're at right if he pulls a high enough number, will he be part of the debate? I do not keep him I think them down. That's what your scores Yeah I know I told Jerry I told you years ago. He's Shingles Elizabeth, Warren, all the time I said to him one day I said you should run for Senate against her. He fucking. House like you. He would win the nomination in Massachusetts. He's also I. Don't think he's I think he's precluded from being the United States Senate told me quit? No, the constitution history be thirty. Who Does Mike Aren't you Davis Are you thirty twenty nine just turned twenty nine now. What are we run for them wickets? That'd be right again. Running again, we'll see we'll their rules platform. When's your birthday again? Monday. Oh okay. Well, happy birthday. It's I.

Incest Party Mike Always United States Senate Steve Hardy Dot vice president Green Party Jack Kennedy Warren Massachusetts Jesus Google Matt Jerry I Rove Teddy Huddleston Michael Geary Harry Dutt
"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

The Kirk Minihane Show

05:56 min | 3 weeks ago

"senate" Discussed on The Kirk Minihane Show

"Chris Cuomo. Off My God what? Did you listen to that or? Louisiana Weightlifter. Saying what did you watch the graphics? Later yeah. That's an interesting move So Nancy got her hair done indoors and She was with wet hair with the mask in the pure apparent to find the Cova nineteen rules. Of course, she's been wagging her finger at everybody and they have the video of it, and of course, immediately. It's a great story I don't care. Anyway it's a great story. It happens all the time, the fraudulence of American politicians both left and right. And Carla Marinucci I think she go right? Yeah. Immediately her reaction this is a polk reporters have to ask is illegal in Ca- California the videotapes them on the private home business without their consent In California this dopey but But yeah, and then Pelosi just just fucking dancing around this thing. Let's of like the jury obviously a very different but like if if he lived his life. He's not dissimilar. No, one would. Honest about it looks like a Republican, getting caught walking out of a gay bath house right which you know Republicans are gay. So that wouldn't happen naturally many in history Donovan part of Legislation Against Gay people who have while they're doing a fucking. Other guys in the asshole while they're killing gay guys in the eighties he's fucking assholes but anyway. Pelosi is just it's just. You know who report is we always say who's going to report on the statement is the speaker complied with the rules is presented to her by this establishment. So if this if the rules where you can take a shit enroll around like. By bye by who the the, but you saw the text, Pelosi's assistant sand, she's coming in and then the owner found out was all pissed off I mean, keep my by one of these salon owners different fucking went to jail a few months ago the stuff. So and it gets reported it'll be like look at these silly people trying to make a big deal. This is like Nancy Pelosi was the one making a big deal. She's going to get a private you know. Wretched just a wretched person just a couple of months ago. They were doing a shot with her wares what how are you preparing for the quarantine and she opens up a twenty thousand dollar refrigerator. Ten ten or fifteen dollars per pint ice cream she's like I'm stocking up how else? Look like an age. Enough talks will do that. Yeah. Yeah. I think she's had some work done. We looked at sixty S I think now. She's eighty years. She was born in nineteen forty. Good again like looks good. The stupid fucking country. She's powerful person Massachusetts and the other guys are the Kennedys at dope too. So I don't care they elect seventy-three-year-old last night so he'll be Ab- essentially eighty when the Senate term has done is a fever fucking years old we just found out this morning that is a furry. Do you mean he goes to the conventions? Yeah. Goes to ferry connections is a picture of imposing with a bunch of furry doesn't Actually staying at a hotel, there was a convention I don't know I'm pretty sure Ed Markey is a furry based on the. Picture? No, he's definitely very likes to get dressed up a little bunny. So so what Rub it? Doesn't doesn't really. Matter. All right. WH- who among US Really that would have been good information to be out there on twitter before theo helped him a personality least shrew she nothing Joe Kennedy's people dropped the ball. He's the guy. Doesn't even live in Massachusetts lives in Maryland piece of Shit, but none of these people live here senators live states, full-time Hillary Clinton, but a lot of time living in New, York before she was a senator there. Oh No, she moved there. She moved to she at least moon. Year runs for Senate fucking Oklahoma or something. Do you think he's going I. Know He's a big hunter Ohio. Hunting. Lodge. That's what I mean like I that that doesn't they're all fucking all phonies now I was thinking this you know the two candidates Biden's one, hundred, fifty trump's fucking hundred. Like your why can't? This is one of these dumb rules. So eighty eight year old can be president, but thirty, two year old can't correct. Well I. Think we need to go the other way I think we need to have age limits upper upper end age limits why that's ageism to I don't I mean I'm fine with it. because. I. Think The you know the voters should be able to fucking do the right thing in elected personalities. You tell the voter, you can't vote for this person because of a certain age, but I think the system is shown. Vote for. The Supreme Court should have that. L. E. Eighteen year terms we all I, mean I don't understand why that's not. I mean I understand but I don't understand I mean you know initially when when at the time of the founding the Supreme Court was not a glorious job and people would like quit after three or four years like people did not enjoy being on the Supreme Court or seek it, hit it and quit it like Elvis dead. Exactly, that's exactly what I was thinking. How does it sound when he says it? He's being what do you mean? I mean Mike is such relationship with Alba's dead. Right Papa, right I'm. Crawling. Am I supposed to do that. Call Him Papa She's not no dad You know I think comb by his first name. I've heard that thrown out a few time. Really. Yeah. Now beaming mom she refers Dubai I really. You'll call them anything right? Now that. The kids. Say Mom I think I could see Steve. Parents by their name I do yeah. That's a Steve Move, all the way to Hawaii. Steve. Dead a congresswoman, their grandparents now. So I have been their grandparents, they will be whatever their grandparent name shirt shoes. Yeah. Yeah. But I but Steve like a guy who's cop like right away like whatever Bento William Yeah just to adults yeah. Yeah. Of course I know it's weird though it's weird. It's you're more confident about stuff like that. That's not a put-down I'm just saying I call the correctly did I not you did yes that's all I'm saying Jesus First Meeting. He didn't start with Mr Whatever No. Wow, that's impressive A lot of ball when you see them to hug them both we see them. Even these times. The down the cheaper now no, I'm just asking me Mike. Well,.

Nancy Pelosi Steve Move Supreme Court Senate Massachusetts Chris Cuomo Mike Carla Marinucci Louisiana Donovan Ed Markey Cova US twitter senator polk Hillary Clinton Oklahoma Papa Biden
"senate" Discussed on On Point with Tom Ashbrook | Podcasts

On Point with Tom Ashbrook | Podcasts

01:41 min | 3 months ago

"senate" Discussed on On Point with Tom Ashbrook | Podcasts

"But the fact that we're even talking about the possibility of Georgia going blue again a really significant signal for where we are right now. Yes and and and similar to what we saw in neighboring north, Carolina or no North Carolina nearby north. Carolina there is a there seems to be that trend in the state. The Stacey Abrams factor is so interesting, isn't it? Clear that if she had, she had run for one of these seats, she would've been far. I mean Ossoff I'm sure is a good candidate. He's not stacey, Abrams. She was an electrifying candidate and it would be A. It would be a bad moment for the Democrats if she's not picked for the presidency, and the comes down to that one seat for control of the Senate and the Republicans hold onto with that. That's not a good look. You GotTa take your chances and politics. She decided to try for the vice presidency. She may get it yet. But. It's similar. The Beto a Rockin. In Texas, he was a strong contender, looked like for a Senate seat, said he went for the presidency now. This is not a Republican locked. Pretty sure thing so These are the what ifs of the of the election. Lots of what if's lots of smart, analysis Jack Beatty are on point news analyst. Thanks so much for joining us today, and and helping us sort this out interesting times, and and a lot to follow in the weeks ahead. Thanks for being with US Jack. Indeed, thanks. And listeners, you can continue the conversation and get the on point podcast at our website on point radio dot org, and you can follow us on twitter. Find US on facebook at on point. Radio.

Stacey Abrams Carolina Senate North Carolina Jack Beatty twitter Georgia Abrams Texas analyst
"senate" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

09:05 min | 5 months ago

"senate" Discussed on The Daily

"It's Wednesday may sixth. Give us the scene inside the US capital on Tuesday morning. So it's a totally surreal setup particularly for those of us that are used to watching congress in wood hearing room across the street from the capital which are usually full of people getting ready to watch senators question a witness and instead you had a totally empty room. You're really quiet. Is Few senators gathered at one side wearing masks? They've got pumps of hand sanitizer at the ready totally at the other side of the room. Maybe twenty or thirty feet away is a witness. Who's ready to give them testimony? They wave across the room. Richard Burr the chairman and Mark Warner the top Democrat. Throw out there. Hobos for a little bit of an elbow bump but there's none of the usual energy that we'd see on a typical weekday morning in the capital. And what exactly is happening in this very weird sounding seen what was playing out was a confirmation hearing in this case of John Radcliffe. Who's a republican congressman and a loyal supporter of president trump? Who's now nominee to be the director of national intelligence to oversee the country's seventeen intelligence agencies? Skip ready right at nine thirty Richard Burr. Who's the chairman of the committee? Pulled down his mask and revealed a scraggly uncharacteristic beard that evidently he'd been growing over the last month. I mean who who hasn't exactly and like all. The order called the hearing into session. This hearing will Be a little bit different. It is perhaps the first congressional hearing held during the extenuating circumstances of the pandemic. We have a sparse crowd and expanded bias reflective of the committee's adherence to the guidelines put forth by the Rules Committee and the attending physician senators had certain social distancing requirements. They were spaced out around the room and only allowed to come in to ask their questions in small waves but without any kind of normal energy tension or cross talk that we might be used to in a high-profile Congressional hearing like this this is basically like a socially distant version of the United States. Senate at work. Yes I wish I could also welcome your wife. Michelle and your daughter's Rally Darby. But given our attempts to minimize the number of people in the hearing room I send them my appreciation via C. Span and it was not very compelling. Tv everything about this hearing that you're describing sounds labored and surreal and risk right. I mean it's a confirmation hearing it's not a pandemic Relief Ville. It's not a hospital funding bill. So why is this even happening in this way in person a lot of senators were asking themselves that question in the last few days as they prepared to come back to Washington as well and you know the answer really goes back more than a month. When at the end of March senators found themselves staring down? This increasingly dire situation Wall Street is about to close any minute now. The Dow collapsing. Its worst single day. Loss Ever Ohio and Illinois shutting down restaurants and bars today. Cal problem is job. Losses are adding up and it is across the country and it is in all sectors out front now Jim Bianco and so the House and Senate Republicans and Democrats did. They rarely do has reached a bipartisan agreement on a historic relief package but as they set aside their own kind of partisan interest in issues in very quickly put together this massive two trillion dollar health and economic relief bill that they passed almost unanimously in the house unanimously. In the Senate to all Americans I say help is on the way big help. And quick help. And then basically out of concern for their own health and safety. They left town and they didn't know when they were GONNA come back. They didn't know if it'd be a couple of weeks or a month and almost as soon as they did lawmakers in both chambers start to debate when and how do we get back to Washington and get back to doing this thing kind of few round to debate but it really comes to a head. Basically last week at the very end of April win both the leaders of the House and Senate come out and say Congress will be back in session next month may fourth. That's according to a tweet from house. Majority leader Steny. Hoyer's press office Senate Majority Leader Mitch. Mcconnell made a similar announcement regarding his comeback on Monday may fourth. And we're going to try getting back to normal as best we can but some house. Democrats say that they are worried about the spread of covered nineteen at the Capitol and some say for the House. As soon as they announced that decision they immediately started getting pushback from some of their members. Who were saying. It's not safe for us to come back. We're not ready any decision that we have that when we come back with sergeant arms and the Capitol Physician Democratic leaders in the House consulted Congress. Top doctor who told them really wouldn't be wise at this point to bring Congress back into session and so not twenty four hours after they announced that they would be coming back to the US House of Representatives on Tuesday changed. Course on its house reversed itself and Said No. We're going to stay out of session indefinitely until conditions have improved and we feel that we need to take action on some meaningful legislation but the Senate comes to very different decision. Meanwhile leadership maintains the upper chamber way backed work as usual on May fourth. They have much the same medical advice. They work on the other half of the Capitol building from the House and Mitch McConnell. Who's the top Republican basically sets the schedule in the Senate he calls the shots says that we're going come back into session. And what are the implications of that decision by McConnell practically speaking we convene the Senate so on the one hand you know the Senate is a pretty small body. It's one hundred senators. You know two thirds of them are over the age of sixty so they are at risk but the real impact. When you start to think about it is. There's this huge network of Support Staff. Basically behind each senator the institution as a whole. There's cooks that run dining services. There's people that keep the capital clean. There's Capitol Police stationed everywhere to keep everyone safe. They're all kinds of jobs that you wouldn't think about it. So the decision to bring an institution like the Senate back into session ripples outward and you know could impact hundreds if not a thousand or more people and what exactly is McConnell stated rationale for doing this. I mean given that the House has said it's too great a risk right. What is his argument for. Why one hundred senators from fifty different states have to get on planes and return to Washington well. Mcconnell essentially says after more than a month away there is a lot of work piling up for the Senate would normally be doing and McConnell essentially put senators in league with frontline workers if it's essential that brave health workers grocery store workers truck drivers and many other. Americans continue to carefully show up for work and it's essential that their US senators carefully show up ourselves and support them you know for asking doctors and health professionals and grocery store workers and other government employees to go out and put themselves at risk every day to show up for work We ought to be doing that to. The Senate is integral to responding to this crisis and if we take the right precautions they can do it safely enough to justify being there so basically his cases were all in this together that's right but I think the reality underpinning that is a little bit more complicated and it has to do both with politics and with the aspirations of Auto Republicans and government leaders..

Senate Mitch McConnell congress United States senator Washington Richard Burr Senate Majority chairman John Radcliffe Michelle Mark Warner Rules Committee Jim Bianco congressman director
"senate" Discussed on We The People

We The People

12:56 min | 9 months ago

"senate" Discussed on We The People

"I'm Jeffrey Rosen. President and CEO of the National Constitution Center and welcome to we the people a weekly show of constitutional original debate. The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by Congress to increase awareness and understanding of the constitution among among the American people. The Senate of the United States is on the verge of holding the impeachment trial of president trump and presiding over. That trial will be chief justice. John Roberts to talk about the chief justice's role in the impeachment trial and the history of chief justices and presidential impeachments impeachments. We're joined by two of America's leading experts on impeachment and on the Constitution. Kenneth Starr is of counsel at the Linear Law Firm. Judge Dr has argued thirty six cases before the US Supreme Court he served as Solicitor General of the United States as a circuit judge for the DC circuit and as independent counsel during the Clinton Presidency from nineteen ninety. Four to one thousand nine hundred ninety nine Ken. Thank you so much for joining my pleasure. Thank you and Joan biskupic is a CNN legal analyst who has covered the Supreme Court for Twenty five years. She's previously been an editor in charge for legal affairs. Is it Reuters and a Supreme Court correspondent for The Washington Post and USA Today her most recent book. That chief is a biography of chief. Justice John Roberts Joan. It's wonderful to have you with us. Thank you Jeff. Let's jump right in Joan. What is the most contested question? Chief Justice does Roberts is likely to decide in the upcoming trial of president trump. And how the chief likely to decide it. Well as things stand it could be a question. Having to do with witnesses and evidence given the Dispute Between House Democrats and Senate Republicans at this time as you know his his one responsibility in the constitution. Is that he presides when the president is subject to an impeachment trial but that's all the constitution says and under Senate rules it's actually a very limited role. He's not sitting as a judge. He's not soon as a juror. He's sitting in as a presiding officer her and according to the Senate rules he does not have a vote but he can be asked to decide questions of evidence whether it's relevant or material so one of the house managers as they're they're called when they bring over. The articles of impeachment could try A to put to the chief some question about witnesses now in one thousand nine hundred ninety nine when Real William Rehnquist was in the chair. Those questions about witnesses were worked out by the Senate majority and I would think given the tensions that are brewing. Now that Senate Majority Leader Mitch. McConnell McConnell is going to try to control that question and the Chief Justice John Roberts would be happy to have him control it and finally Jeff if he does does make any kind of determination on witnesses or evidence per the nineteen eighty-six rules he can be overturned by majority of the Senate Senate. Because the bottom line is that this is the Senate's show. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Senate has the sole responsibility to decide whether whether president is convicted or acquitted. And John Roberts will be sitting up there on that data's trying to make sure the proceedings run well but not taking a heavy hand can. Do you agree with Joan that the chief is unlikely to make rulings that he knows might be overruled by a majority of the Senate and when it comes to witnesses could could you imagine Senate Democrats asking chief to compel witnesses after the majority has decided not to hold them in him making a substantive ruling or not. Yes I I think he will make a conscious effort to number one follow history and tradition and so Jonas absolutely right the Clinton model of and Chief Justice Rehnquist. For whom Chief Justice John. Roberts clerked Almost a half century ago The less is is going to be his model and intern. Chief justice rank was used as his model chief justice salmon p chase during the only prior air impeachment that made it to the United States Senate of sitting president in the trial of Andrew Johnson. I I would agree with with the thrust of what Jones sad with perhaps a bit of a tweak and the tweak would be because of his sense that this is the Senate Senate sold power. He should not be making any decision. I'm projecting here the chief would save himself. I count on make any decision that might have a substantive effect an outcome on the substantive judgment of acquittal Or of guilty. This is for the Senate. It's the prerogative of the Senate and thus we know from the Clinton impeachment final point And this is exactly Jones point it was the Senate that worked it out now there. There was cheerful agreement. There were one hundred senators going in in contrast to what is likely to be the case. Now who Agreed no witnesses going in then when the issue emerged again on into the trial after the impeachment managers there's had presented and the president's able lawyers had presented then it was put to a vote and the vote was overwhelmingly seventy two thirty something thing like that overwhelmingly. We do not want life witnesses depositions and so the other thing is that the chief will be aware that there's going to be a lot of negotiation going on between the house managers and the Senate leadership within the Senate itself and his job is to stay above the fray You both mentioned the Clinton Trial and Joan. You just wrote a fascinating article for CNN.com. Based on your study of the files of Chief Justice Rehnquist the peace was called how the last chief justice has handled an impeachment trial of the president of the United States among many fascinating nuggets. You found that Senator Harkin had sent a letter to Rehnquist asking him to adopt limits limits on the house managers questioning a potential witnesses and chief justice rehnquist begged off. Tell us more about that incident and about other things you learned from the Rehnquist files. Yes it was. It was quite a fine because The the actual records from that Impeachment trial are under seal for about fifty years but in Rehnquist personal final files out at the Stanford campus in the Hoover Institution. I was able to find his correspondence while he was presiding over the trial and and As both of you know Bill Rehnquist whatever you thought him on on the law he did have that whimsical side. So of course. He showed up in black robe that was decked out in gold stripes that he had affixed to his robe to his sleeves years earlier inspired by a character in Gilbert and Sullivan's Lancy Fancy and he also quoted from LANC- when he wrote to people to say how it how it went. He said I did nothing in particular and did it very well but but going to the substance of things I found in his in his files. You're exactly right that at one point when he was encouraged to actually I make more of a substantive ruling to intercede he said He did not want to and he said he would claim authority. Only when it's exercise was clearly warranted and the one time probably the the most notable ruling a beyond what was already prearranged When rink think win Chief Justice Rehnquist was dealing with the house managers in the senators head to do with The house managers kept referring in their arguments to the senators as jurors and that was another time when Democrats objected saying they shouldn't be calling us mere jurors and Chief Justice Rehnquist agreed. He sided with them saying that the Senate is not simply a jury in this matter. It's a court in this case. So Oh he he was trying to win. It was timed intercede. He did at other times. He stepped back. But Jeff. You know what it's like across the street three to the Supreme Court. There are no cameras allowed over there. The justices do most of their work in enclosed chambers. So when William Rehnquist it came to preside it was the first time that he was in such a prominent spotlight and he got so many letters from people ranging from things having to do with politics and his voice on the law to the fact that he would stand up intermittently during the proceedings to exercises bad back so so people writing in from all corners of the country to tell them how to fix his back problem. Many thanks for those wonderful tidbits and for the great expressions of concern by fellow back suffers. The quotation is great. We the people listeners. I have to confess I am a fan. It's a it's a private vice that I I have. So here's the homework for the week. The line that rank was was quoting comes from I- ALANTHEA's John said I'm going to read you. The two stands. And if you can write in with the final stanzas to me then I'll send you a a copy of my book conversations with our G here. It goes when Wellington thrashed Bonaparte as every child can tell. The House appears throughout the war. Did nothing in particular and did did it very well. So tell me what comes next and you get the book Okay Ken. You had a central role in the impeachment of President Clinton as the independent counsel and you watched chief justice. Rehnquist presided carefully. What struck you about his performance? What moments jumped? And what do you think. We're his most important substantive rulings I think he had read and Hamilton's federalist seventy eight even though this was not a classic judicial role of Colonel Hamilton said in describing the federal judiciary again. This is an extraordinary unusual role for the chief justice of the United States. That this is to be the least dangerous branch where where power or will is exercised elsewhere but only judgment so I think that Chief Justice Rehnquist steeped as he was in and the trial of President Johnson and aware that President Johnson trial was obviously enormously acrimonious. Ramona's there were eleven articles of impeachment. The reconstruction of the South was at issue and as a serious. If if advocate student of history mystery Chief Justice Rehnquist had to be aware and perhaps his files show this that chief justice chase came under considerable criticism schism after the fact that he was somehow nudging the Senate along in favor of acquittal. Well that would be to Chief Justice Roberts now unconscionable how can I conduct myself so that no fear minded person can say. I was putting a thumb on the scales. And of course that's important for any judge in a judicial capacity to be fair minded and open minded and to listen with respect and so forth so I think there will be this sense. The less the the quip from Gilbert and Sullivan that Chief Justice Rehnquist so colorfully articulated embraced in this context. Is I need to do very little. And refer matters back to the Senate. This is a matter this entrusted to the judgment of the Senate. I think we may hear that over and over again if as I expect. There's a lot of acrimony and a failure to agree as they're happily. There was not that Eh profound profound failure to the contrary during Clinton As the more we learn about the Clinton impeachment the more we know that there was as though the atmosphere was very acrimony is there was an enormous amount of harmony among the all one hundred senators there was not this deep partisan in divine a striking difference indeed Joan what could be surprising about The kind of questions Chief Justice Justice Roberts might be asked to rule on you could imagine questions of executive privilege that some senators might try to take up to the Supreme Court in the middle of the trial if it lasted more than on a couple of days of how could the chief rule on or sidestep those questions. And what are the curveballs. He might face sure..

William Rehnquist Senate Chief Justice Justice Roberts Senate Senate President Clinton US Supreme Court president John Roberts United States Joan biskupic Justice John Roberts Joan Bill Rehnquist Rehnquist President and CEO Jeff National Constitution Center President Johnson
"senate" Discussed on Article II: Inside Impeachment

Article II: Inside Impeachment

10:38 min | 9 months ago

"senate" Discussed on Article II: Inside Impeachment

"Hey Chris as you know. Sometimes it's good to just take a step back from the day to day onslaught of news and take our broader. Look the issues. That's what I'm doing each week on my podcast. Why is this happening? We're exploring topics ranging from school segregation to climate change. Well the way that I think of it is. Climate Change will be to the twenty first century. What maternity west of the nineteenth century? It'll be the central subject of questions about economic justice. Everything you care about in the world will be affected by climate and digging deep with guests uniquely qualified to analyze issues from incarceration to race relations as you know for the first time in our history at the national level level whites are on the verge of losing their majority status in twenty years. And I think it's no coincidence that our politics are getting more tribal. Join me for wisest happening. New episodes episodes every Tuesday. Wherever you get your podcasts so frank on this question of whether each side will get it to call witnesses? That's really important to this debate. Who are we talking about? What witnesses do you think each side would plan to call so Senate Minority leader? Her Chuck Schumer has sent a letter to majority leader. McConnell asking specifically for four witnesses actually ended up sending that letter to the entire Senate it. That's all we want the facts. We don't know how these witnesses will testify. We don't know what the documents if we get them. Our hands on them will say. Maybe they'll be expelled. Tori of president trump. Or maybe they'll be further condemning president trump's actions we don't know but we should see them regardless of what what they say and two of the notable witnesses would be John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney the acting chief of staff at the White House the four or witnesses that Schumer asked for were not witnesses that we heard from in the house impeachment inquiry now. McConnell has responded saying there's no precedent precedent for hearing for new witnesses in this trial that that the reason why the impeachment inquiry exists is to get all the information and send it over to the Senate to be able to you decide whether or not to convict now. In the ninety nine trial of President Clinton they had witnesses that they deposed instead of actually having them live on the Senate floor. which technically you could do? They had them in a room and they were. They videotaped a question and answer and then they ended up playing those questions and answers on the Senate four for senators to watch now the difference there. Is that those those witnesses that they depose which included Monica Lewinsky. Were actually witnesses. That had already ready been heard from as a part of the investigation that resulted in articles of impeachment passing in the House. This would be different situation. Schumer is asking for something different. Here he's asking for more he's asking for particular witnesses that have information related to this case that have not been heard from the only other issue here. Is that what this would potentially open up. The Senate to is the flipside witnesses that Republicans might actually want to talk to. Which is somebody like? Joe Biden Hunter Biden. There's a number of different people. Republicans have threatened to call in the event that they're witnesses that Democrats want you the idea of having witnesses witnesses shortness. In fact I talked to the Senator Joni Ernst a couple of weeks ago and I said well would you be open to having a Mulvaney Bolton testify before the Senate you WanNa hear Mulvaney or like people want to hear from fighting. It's kind of a back and forth that they're going to have to do because they need fifty one senators to agree to have any kind of witnesses at all. There might be a back and forth negotiation. That would if you end up opening up the Senate to Democratic witness you also might open up the Senate to a Republican witness so free it seems like this issue of fairness is hanging everything whether we're talking about witnesses or whether we're talking about if Speaker Pelosi is even going to hand over these articles of impeachment and start a Senate trial. There seems to be the the big thing that both sides are using as they point back and forth to each other. Can you just walk us through. Wind did this issue becomes such a flash point and how of both sides been using it. Will I mean the idea of fairness is is obviously an important one. It's obviously also defined by either side in different ways. The idea of leader McConnell saying I am not an impartial. Juror was a notable thing for him to say. Also D- partisan political decision to impeach. We will have largely partisan outcome in the Senate. I'm not impartial about this at all but at the same time you know a Senate trial and impeachment trial is inherently political. He's going to advocate for his person for his president. Now the reality is that you know. The the senators are going to take an oath. If they're going to take an oath. But at the beginning of the trial saying I solemnly swear that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment I will do impartial justice according to the constitutions and laws so help me God. That isn't that they're going to be taking but again. They are not technically impartial. Jury this is not a court of law. There's not the same expectations. Well Frank. I have learned a lot from this now. Some of our listeners. Have some questions for you. Kamal from Lakewood California says could certain senators. Just choose to not show up for the final vote or abstain from the vote. So that's a good question. I think that there's a a little bit of an open answer. There I mean I think you know. Senators are compelled to be there for the trial. I think that senators have said that they would be there for the trial that they would do. Do their duty. There's been a little bit of discussion about what happens if you know Senate. Trial is happening during debate. Day Whether or not there could be an agreement amongst the Senate which would require basically all one hundred senators to move the trial time or the trial date maybe push today or move it a little bit earlier. Technically President Clinton's trial. We saw the trial happened. Start at usually one o'clock pm and go until around five or six o'clock They could move that but I mean I in in reality all one hundred senators are expected to be in their seats for the entire time. And that's one of the things that McConnell has been kind of dangling over senators as a way way to get them to realize that this is going to be heavy and potentially long process. They're going to be there sitting in their seats and they really Kinda. Don't you have an option and then pat from Dallas says can achieve justice overruled. The Senate vote well so the chief justice as we kind of already already established could have an active or a passive role and. I think the expectation is that he would probably have a passive role meaning. He would leave a lot of the questions to the body of the the Senate to vote on if there is a motion. Made if there's an objection made he would let the Senate decided to vote now. Hypothetically the chief justice could overrule all emotion but again any motion by or any decision made by the chief. Justice is subject to a responding motion by any senator her which would then be put up for a vote. The short answer is no fifty-one senators. Have the most power during the Senate trial that is just the reality. What the chief justice? We'll do is just oversee this trial and make sure that it doesn't get unruly and take their cues from the parliamentarian and from the folks that will let them know let him know how they expect the Senate trial to go so frank last question for me. This just comes from talking to family over the holidays the people want to know. Is this a foregone conclusion that Republicans control the Senate so the president won't be convicted and should they even be paying attention to what happens. That's next to the Senate and if so why should they. It's not a ridiculous thing to think that this feels like a foregone conclusion and McConnell has said as much he's basically typically assured that the president will not be convicted. They need sixty seven votes to do so. That would take twenty Republicans to join all democrats and that's a they've a highly unlikely scenario for them to vote to convict and remove the president now. Obviously we've seen the president tweet about a million times about this this. We've seen his surrogates argue. Why they feel like this impeachment is in their words Sham but the reality is is that a lot of that has been very much focused on the process and this this trial is going to be very different? It's going to be worth watching simply because it's going to be more austere almost in a way. There's not going to be the yelling and the screaming and the crazy motions and things like that put forward and end. Democrats or Republicans giving speeches in the middle of MARKUPS. And so we're going to hear a clear argument from the house managers. Why they feel that? What what president trump did was impeachable? And we're going to actually hear the defense. The White House argue. Why it's not and that's something? I think that whether or not there are enough enough votes for the president to be convicted or not is definitely worth watching. That's a great argument. Well we will certainly be watching and we will be watching for your great coverage from the floor. Our thanks Frank Q.. Article two inside. Peach is produced by Isabel Angel. Max Jacobs Jacobs Clear Tie Air Dalton. preseve are Thon Alison Bailey. Adam Noboa and Barbara Wrap our executive producer is Ellen Franken Steve. Lik Tai is the executive producer of audio. I'm Julia Ainsley. NBC News correspondent covering the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security. We'll be off on Wednesday for the New Year. But Steve Kornacki will be back in the host chair on Friday. Hi Everyone Steve Kornacki. Thanks for listening now I want to invite you to talk to us appeared NBC News. We'd like to know more about you. And the topics you'd be interested in hearing about as we look to launch new podcasts. So you can text the word podcast. Two six six six eight six six. We'll text you a link to a short survey again. Text the word podcast to six eight six six standard text messaging rates. Apply your input matters and we are looking forward to hearing from you..

Senate president McConnell senator Frank Q President Clinton Chuck Schumer Mick Mulvaney trump Departments of Justice and Hom Chris Monica Lewinsky Joe Biden Hunter Biden Senator Joni Ernst White House Steve Kornacki
"senate" Discussed on What Next | Daily News and Analysis

What Next | Daily News and Analysis

10:21 min | 1 year ago

"senate" Discussed on What Next | Daily News and Analysis

"In collaboration with sleep studios dairypure believes the world would be you better place if we reconnected to it's pure and innocent in ourselves and in each other that's what host mallory kasdan explores how to raise a parent throughout the series she talks six to parents and experts about how our kids can teach us to shift our perspectives conquer our fears and become more open to all the exciting things. The world has to offer make sure to listen and subscribe to how to raise a parent where you get your podcasts this week. I like to think that washington d._c. Has that back to school feeling senators and members of congress heading heading back to the capital getting ready to do the people's work slates jim newell he is here to burst my bubble. Everyone will come back and you know why they're gonna have a lot of work to do on a government spending bills and they may wanna take up some gun legislation will see if they're still the movement to do that but it's not really too dramatic. I know people just come back pretty quickly and pick up right where they left off which is doing very little gym lives in the muck muck of the swamp so he can see this vast disconnect between what politicians say and what they're actually able to do. Just you're watching democratic debate with this guy. He's like medicare for all free college. They can't even reauthorize violence against women act over here. I mean being a congress. Supporter like has ruined me. You know in terms of you know having any hope really just i watch it. I'm just like this is never going to happen. You know you can promise promise everything but if you don't change the rules. The chances of it happening are pretty slim. One of those rules that some people in washington are starting to think we should change is the filibuster that's because it's become all but a requirement that legislation passed the senate with sixty votes instead of a simple majority you make the case like why should we eliminate the filibuster. Well i think right now. We have a system where we haven't election. One party does really well they take over the government and then for some reason nothing that they campaign non can get through congress. I think people don't really understand this and they start to wonder what's the point of these elections. If nothing could happen you know why. Why do we even bother doing this. It might encourage people to participate more in the electoral process and it would also just plainly make more sense that you know if if you win an election by a big margin then you have the opportunity to actually do what you campaigned on. I also think and this might be stretched but if you then have have the ability to pass what you want and you know that the pressure is going to be on you to actually do what you campaigned on then maybe when you campaign you might be able to more or realistic in what you say like there are a lot of people who you know campaign on the wildest promises knowing that they're not actually going to get anywhere in the senate because of the filibuster so maybe if the filibuster is gone and you're gonna be on the line do something we we can have a little bit more coherent and pragmatic debate during during campaigns when someone like elizabeth warren says she wants big structural change. This is the kind of thing she's talking about. Getting rid of the filibuster former senate majority leader harry reid said he wants to call the filibuster to both of them. They've noticed they can't keep proposing big things unless the senate it goes through some fundamental change. The senate is sort of at a point right now where needs to decide what it wants to be you know is going to allow authorities to govern earn or is it going to try to hold onto this idea that consensus can be reached the senate game where the filibuster would effectively be this official acknowledgement that consensus can be reached in the political culture anymore. Does that make you does that. Mean you optimistic or pessimistic optimistic about what uh-huh very jim newell answer today on the show washington is about to head back to work but will they be able to get anything done and if they can't should lawmakers consider drastic steps to ease the blockade none of this i mean none of this makes the optimistic. It's really unhealthy political culture right now. It's just a matter of of managing. I'm mary harris. You're listening to what next stick with us people can get a little confused about why the senate is in more of a legislation relation factory part of the reason stall out is because congress is divided senate majority leader. Mitch mcconnell isn't just about to pass a bunch of democratic bills also sent over by the house that is not his style but the other reason install is because the senate is divided and the filibuster makes it impossible to advance legislation even if you've got a slim majority when i think about the filibuster get these really specific images in my mind and i think of wendy davis on the floor of the texas state senate in her pink sneakers talking about abortion clinics and why it's important to keep them open or i think of jimmy stewart in mr smith goes to washington you like speaks on the floor of the senate for twenty four hours arguing against corruption that actually ends with the senator he's talking about running onto the floor and saying i'm not fit for office is very dramatic thing. What did those images get wrong. There are a little more <hes> romanticised than the way it really is. There's also times where the filibuster you know an image that may we might associate with it as well as when strom thurmond gave a twenty four hour filibuster block civil rights legislation so it's not always you know this wonderful <hes> patriotic duty so so the filibuster it's basically an outgrowth of the senate not really having many rules covering debate. I mean the senate rules about debate. It says if a senator like to speak the chairs shall recognize that person and they can speak for as long as they want so the idea behind a filibuster is just to you speak as long as you want us. Whatever delay tactics you can to try and push back vote in the hope that you either persuade the public or persuade the the people pushing a certain bill to drop it or you just take up so much time that the majority leader decides. It's not worth pursuing this anymore. Just wear them down yeah. Yeah just wear them down. So i mean it is you could say true. Filibuster is really where you're just holing floor one person talking for as long as possible but it's become so vague as to i just mean using the senate's lack of rules about to debate try and make it sort of a pain in the ass to try to pass something. Can you walk doc me through how this works like win. The house sends the senate something they want past. How does the filibuster intervene and to get in the way. The way it works. Normally is just you know. The majority leader looks around realizes something isn't going to get sixty votes and then doesn't even bring it up their recent examples of this that you might remember. Let's look at the the manchin toomey gun bill after the sandy hook shooting in twenty thirteen when they tried to do this. It was brought up. There was a gun debate open. This amendment was brought up so there is a motion to proceed onto this amendment so then that got filibustered meaning you know there was just a very lengthy debate and there's an effort to cut off debate that effort to proceed to it got fifty four votes think it needed sixty so it just failed. They never proceeded to considering that. I mean that's an example of how it worked. Got a minority you know at least forty one senators senators does not want something to happen and they're going to use up a lot of floor time. If that comes to the floor so the majority leader just decides not to bring it up in the first place. I mean that's practically what it is now. It's not like it doesn't actually get to the floor a lot. It's just mitch mcconnell knowing that this is going to be blocked by by the the minority and they're gonna take too much time and he'd rather do something else during that time so he doesn't bring it up and the filibuster wasn't part of the founders original idea of how how this body would work was it no. There's no mention of it in the constitution or anything i mean the way it developed was the way senate. Rules are written to just allow open ended debate until the body reaches consensus. I mean that was obviously being exploited. In the form of filibuster so around world war one they finally introduced what's called the cloture rule which which allows debates be cut off they of course because it's the senate have to use a word like cloture. They can't use closure or ending debate. When did the filibuster like dirty like. When did it become a dirty word. I'm really in the last fifteen years. That's when the number of cloture richer votes really started increasing exponentially on pretty routine mares of business. I mean nominations both the court and the executive brands as well as legislations. I mean it's become routine now where it really didn't used to be. I mean used to be a fairly rare thing when someone would have to introduce a cloture petition to cut off debate but now it's just sort of you know standard operating procedure for pretty much anything that comes up anything of any importance i should say the first couple years ears of obama's presidency and that's really when mitch mcconnell made a pretty big discovery which was if you stop stop the president's legislation. You won't necessarily get blamed for being obstructionists as hard as democrats tried to make mitch mcconnell the obstructionists. The public won't really blame um you. They'll blame the president and the majority party for not getting things done so that's sort.

senate Mitch mcconnell congress senator washington jim newell mallory kasdan strom thurmond obama harry reid elizabeth warren mary harris texas president executive
"senate" Discussed on Vox's The Weeds

Vox's The Weeds

02:02 min | 2 years ago

"senate" Discussed on Vox's The Weeds

"In a way it is that the problem is that they don't want to repeat the failures of the 2013 senate immigration bill which as we remember past with an mostly democratic votes and end arab a smaller group of republican votes herbicides substantial i mean this is all cyst as they sixty seven sixty eight vote bill yes so it's not you know when we say a small number of republican votes were kind of used to thinking of that is exactly as many voters there he ada it was a it was a nice bipartisan vote most republicans were against it so rubio until list both said this week that like that they think the main actually rubin said this little earlier that they think the main sort of issue is that they need a bill that enough conservatives can be happy with they they really are suspicious they basically want it will dead and they want to apply the logic of the house it has to rewrite preemptively to the senate yet at us he's the spend a lot of sense if you think about this as you don't want to take of a hard vote on a bill that won't become law vast rule it as far as we know would be in place in the house i agree with marco rubio the interesting thing about that to me is backed beckett back in 2013 rate a b conservative imperative was to make sure that the house did not pass any immigration bill of any kind regardless of its content because that would open the door to a conference committee and now the white house seems committed to getting the house to pass this goodlatte mccall bill that because they like with the bill says but it technically like changes the legislative dynamic ready equates a situation in which a mike brown's say can go back around to tell us in rubio and say well we should take this up and we should amend it with our ideas and a kick it back.

rubin senate marco rubio mike brown beckett goodlatte mccall
"senate" Discussed on WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

01:39 min | 3 years ago

"senate" Discussed on WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

"And while of i guess this is his job in interest he was fairly optimistic about prospects for getting this through the senate uh with republican votes uh they unrolled that unveiled it on thursday morning to the senate republican conference the entire conference and nobody so far is saying they won't vote for it there are some people who say well you know i prefer this or that but that it's a totally different vibe kim than there was on healthcare and that is that suggests may be the the the the republicans understand that they really do have to do this uh or um they're going to be dead in 2018 yeah it's remarkable they're feeling optimistic on on a lot of different levels one is because they are actually sticking to the schedule that they put out the house ways and means committee got its version of the bill outta committee on thursday the senate released its details next week the house hopes to pass this thing on the floor uh they're going to have a series of amendments will see how that happens but ty wise this is going forward i think they feel really pleased that they got some groups that they were worried that would not get the support of a key to that that then fipb the national federation of independent businesses that's the group that tends to support the lobby outfit for most small businesses in the country at an app ibn sort of withheld its support it was concerned about the way that small businesses were treated it has ended up coming out to spark both the house and senate bell.

senate the house national federation
"senate" Discussed on Constitutional

Constitutional

01:31 min | 3 years ago

"senate" Discussed on Constitutional

"To elect women to the senate under the old system than you do under the new system we don't get our first female senator till 1928 two she's appointed the first electedwoman senator comes in 1932 if they had had to contend with the indirect election system were they had to go and get the favour of the state legislature to gain office it will take an even longer to get women to into office because they didn't have those kinds of connections and state government so i think the fact that we have twenty one women senators in the senate today is also due in part to the fact that we now have a direct election system and what about a better functioning senate one that can work more effectively to serve its citizens it's interesting because this constitutional amendment like many others has had consequences intended an unintended it did get rid of the deadlocks and he got rid of course of the bribery of legislators it also helped to cement a stronger bond between senators in their constituents because now they had to go directly to the voter rather than just to the state legislature and i think that in the long run is had a positive impact in many ways it also had some unintended consequences no senators had to go out and start campaigning for instance that led to questions of campaignfinance questions a campaign finance reform in it's been a long story to where we are today where we have millions of dollars spent time senate elections.

senate senator bribery
"senate" Discussed on Constitutional

Constitutional

02:18 min | 3 years ago

"senate" Discussed on Constitutional

"By 19 on nine we're living in a united states were almost every issue is touched by the issue of race and that becomes an important component in the direct election system because the only way that idaho's senator william bora could convince his peers to let the proposed constitutional amendment for direct election actually leave the judiciary subcommittee and go to the senate floor for a vote was if he agreed to tack on to it something that the southern democrats wanted a race rider the race rider basically stipulates that if the constitution is amended and we switchover to allowing voters to directly elect their senators then shorer that's fine but the states themselves have the ability to control the terms of the elections the federal government won't have any say now the reason this was called a race rider is that what these southern states were essentially saying between the lines was we don't want african americans in our state to participate in electing senators so if we're going to have popularly elected senators then we better be able to create whatever voting terms we see fit in other words we better be able to exclude any one we want to when you're talking about the 17th amendment the two sections of the constitution that you have to think about there's article 1 section three which is the part that defines house senate elections happening and that's what they're trying to change from indirect to direct election but there's also article 1 section four which says that the times places in manner of holding elections for senators and representatives shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof and it says the congress may at any time by law maker alter such regulations and it's that phrase that becomes the target of the debate in the senate in nineteen on nine in nineteen tan in 1911.

united states idaho senator william bora african americans congress senate
"senate" Discussed on The Brookings Cafeteria

The Brookings Cafeteria

01:32 min | 3 years ago

"senate" Discussed on The Brookings Cafeteria

"I like to think that i am generally pretty optimistic person but i wouldn't want anyone to leave the book thinking that the procedures that i write about our a solution to all of our problems and part of that is because as i show in the book when they're created a tend to be created in situations where they're going to help the majority party in the senate so right now the republicans mm past periods the democrats but they've been created when creating them is going to help the majority party probably stay in power in the future and as i showing the book in the context of reconciliation there are also used in ways that should help the majority party stay in power in the future and so as a result can be challenging to get members of the minority to go along with the idea of creating them which can be necessary since after all their included in regular pieces of legislation and a regular piece of legislation has to itself overcome the threat of a filibuster so we can and do you see them in particular cases we've seen a couple of new ones crop up in recent years there's a point that i talk about in the food collusions the book about how they've been used to help us get out of a couple of our recent showdowns over the debt limit which still so a an issue that's coming back soon um so they're important than they have helped usher in tow lost some important policy changes but i don't see them as the big solution to getting out of all of our thank you again books social thank you very much as.

senate